spinner
x
This website is using cookies, in order to track this cookie warning and other popups, for managing login sessions, and for website analytics. We do not collect or store personally identifiable information, nor track or display advertising related information. That's Fine

Galactic Records

(updated weekly)


Index

Wolf‑Rayet N Star Systems

  TypeData 
 
Body Count (Discovery Scan)
Wolf‑Rayet N Star Systems
Highest: 28
Lowest: 1  651 *
Average: 1.9972
Count: 1,445Standard Deviation: 1.6496 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
id64boxelID
Wolf‑Rayet N Star Systems
Highest: 131,584
Lowest: 0  5,775 *
Average: 45.7866
Count: 5,779Standard Deviation: 2,144.3722 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
id64boxelnum
Wolf‑Rayet N Star Systems
Highest: 861
Lowest: 0  139 *
Average: 207.9893
Count: 5,779Standard Deviation: 201.6987 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
id64mass
Wolf‑Rayet N Star Systems
Highest: 7  5,775 *
Lowest: 2  2 *
Average: 6.9971
Count: 5,779Standard Deviation: 0.1139 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
id64sectorID
Wolf‑Rayet N Star Systems
Highest: 491,558
Lowest: 90,149
Average: 296,682.0185
Count: 5,779Standard Deviation: 41,675.7582 Top10/Bottom10
 
Number of Ammonia worlds
Wolf‑Rayet N Star Systems
Highest: 1  2 *
Lowest: 0  5,758 *
Average: 0.0003
Count: 5,760Standard Deviation: 0.0186 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
Number of Bodies (Total Reported)
Wolf‑Rayet N Star Systems
Highest: 42
Lowest: 1  2,716 *
Average: 1.9089
Count: 5,760Standard Deviation: 1.4272 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
Number of Earth-like worlds
Wolf‑Rayet N Star Systems
Highest: 0  5,760 *
Lowest: 0  5,760 *
Average: 0
Count: 5,760Standard Deviation: 0 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
Number of Planets (Reported)
Wolf‑Rayet N Star Systems
Highest: 21
Lowest: 0  5,328 *
Average: 0.1045
Count: 5,760Standard Deviation: 0.6416 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
Number of Stars (Reported)
Wolf‑Rayet N Star Systems
Highest: 21
Lowest: 1  2,911 *
Average: 1.8043
Count: 5,760Standard Deviation: 1.0703 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
Number of Terraforming Candidates
Wolf‑Rayet N Star Systems
Highest: 1  6 *
Lowest: 0  5,754 *
Average: 0.001
Count: 5,760Standard Deviation: 0.0323 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
Number of Water Worlds
Wolf‑Rayet N Star Systems
Highest: 1  6 *
Lowest: 0  5,754 *
Average: 0.001
Count: 5,760Standard Deviation: 0.0323 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
Sagittarius A* Distance
Wolf‑Rayet N Star Systems
Highest: 38,117.6072365697
Lowest: 1,518.40875960556
Average: 9,000.0423
Count: 5,779Standard Deviation: 4,404.7906 Top10/Bottom10
 
Sol Distance
Wolf‑Rayet N Star Systems
Highest: 55,839.9
Lowest: 2,500.03
Average: 26,036.7864
Count: 5,779Standard Deviation: 6,374.3505 Top10/Bottom10
 

Galactic Records BETA | Last update: 2023-12-02 13:39:34

Records by Body Type

Records by Attribute

System Attributes

    Planet Attributes

    Star Attributes

    Star/Planet Attributes

    Ring/Belt Attributes

This website is not an official tool for the game Elite: Dangerous and is not affiliated with Frontier Developments. All information provided is based on publicly available information and data supplied by players, and may not be entirely accurate. 'Elite', the Elite logo, the Elite: Dangerous logo, 'Frontier' and the Frontier logo are registered trademarks of Frontier Developments plc. All rights reserved. All other trademarks and copyrights are acknowledged as the property of their respective owners.

Special thanks go to all commanders and explorers who graciously upload their data to EDDN, EDSM, and EDAstro to make all of this possible. We wouldn't exist without your data contributions. For any bug reports or feature suggestions, please visit our forum thread.