spinner
x
This website is using cookies, in order to track this cookie warning and other popups, for managing login sessions, and for website analytics. We do not collect or store personally identifiable information, nor track or display advertising related information. That's Fine

Galactic Records

(updated weekly)


Index

Wolf‑Rayet NC Star Systems

  TypeData 
 
Body Count (Discovery Scan)
Wolf‑Rayet NC Star Systems
Highest: 12  2 *
Lowest: 1  636 *
Average: 1.9439
Count: 1,443Standard Deviation: 1.1108 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
id64boxelID
Wolf‑Rayet NC Star Systems
Highest: 0  5,916 *
Lowest: 0  5,916 *
Average: 0
Count: 5,916Standard Deviation: 0 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
id64boxelnum
Wolf‑Rayet NC Star Systems
Highest: 873
Lowest: 0  131 *
Average: 208.7111
Count: 5,916Standard Deviation: 201.9878 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
id64mass
Wolf‑Rayet NC Star Systems
Highest: 7  5,916 *
Lowest: 7  5,916 *
Average: 7
Count: 5,916Standard Deviation: 0 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
id64sectorID
Wolf‑Rayet NC Star Systems
Highest: 475,177
Lowest: 90,151
Average: 295,676.7123
Count: 5,916Standard Deviation: 41,721.2886 Top10/Bottom10
 
Number of Ammonia worlds
Wolf‑Rayet NC Star Systems
Highest: 0  5,901 *
Lowest: 0  5,901 *
Average: 0
Count: 5,901Standard Deviation: 0 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
Number of Bodies (Total Reported)
Wolf‑Rayet NC Star Systems
Highest: 19
Lowest: 1  2,683 *
Average: 1.9148
Count: 5,901Standard Deviation: 1.1488 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
Number of Earth-like worlds
Wolf‑Rayet NC Star Systems
Highest: 0  5,901 *
Lowest: 0  5,901 *
Average: 0
Count: 5,901Standard Deviation: 0 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
Number of Planets (Reported)
Wolf‑Rayet NC Star Systems
Highest: 13
Lowest: 0  5,425 *
Average: 0.0922
Count: 5,901Standard Deviation: 0.4133 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
Number of Stars (Reported)
Wolf‑Rayet NC Star Systems
Highest: 12
Lowest: 1  2,879 *
Average: 1.8226
Count: 5,901Standard Deviation: 1.0069 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
Number of Terraforming Candidates
Wolf‑Rayet NC Star Systems
Highest: 1  2 *
Lowest: 0  5,899 *
Average: 0.0003
Count: 5,901Standard Deviation: 0.0184 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
Number of Water Worlds
Wolf‑Rayet NC Star Systems
Highest: 1  3 *
Lowest: 0  5,898 *
Average: 0.0005
Count: 5,901Standard Deviation: 0.0225 Top10/Bottom10
* Total bodies in this category sharing this value.
 
Sagittarius A* Distance
Wolf‑Rayet NC Star Systems
Highest: 37,533.9195603461
Lowest: 1,524.21122662598
Average: 9,066.8796
Count: 5,916Standard Deviation: 4,407.8731 Top10/Bottom10
 
Sol Distance
Wolf‑Rayet NC Star Systems
Highest: 57,660.2
Lowest: 3,318.23
Average: 26,006.7651
Count: 5,916Standard Deviation: 6,376.1194 Top10/Bottom10
 

Galactic Records BETA | Last update: 2023-12-02 13:39:34

Records by Body Type

Records by Attribute

System Attributes

    Planet Attributes

    Star Attributes

    Star/Planet Attributes

    Ring/Belt Attributes

This website is not an official tool for the game Elite: Dangerous and is not affiliated with Frontier Developments. All information provided is based on publicly available information and data supplied by players, and may not be entirely accurate. 'Elite', the Elite logo, the Elite: Dangerous logo, 'Frontier' and the Frontier logo are registered trademarks of Frontier Developments plc. All rights reserved. All other trademarks and copyrights are acknowledged as the property of their respective owners.

Special thanks go to all commanders and explorers who graciously upload their data to EDDN, EDSM, and EDAstro to make all of this possible. We wouldn't exist without your data contributions. For any bug reports or feature suggestions, please visit our forum thread.